Best LLM for Long Documents in 2026
Context window size is the deciding factor when your document is longer than a model can hold in memory. Below that limit, quality and coherence matter more. Here is how the major models stack up on both dimensions.
Last updated: February 2026
Llama 4 Scout's 10 million token context window is in a category of its own — roughly 7.5 million words. Entire book series, massive codebases, or years of email history fit in a single prompt. Open weights mean you can self-host for maximum privacy. The intelligence gap vs frontier models is real but the context advantage is dramatic.
API via Groq: $0.11/$0.11 per 1M tokens. Free tier available on Groq. Self-host with GPU hardware.
Try freeGemini 3 Pro's 1 million token context window is the largest for a fully managed commercial model — roughly 750,000 words. Handles full books, large codebases, and multi-document research sets. AA Intelligence Index 48.44 means it's also more capable than Llama 4 Scout on the actual analysis once it has the document loaded.
Free via gemini.google.com. API at $2/$12 per 1M tokens (2× rate for prompts over 200K tokens).
Try freeGrok 4.1's 2 million token context window is the second-largest among commercial models and covers most enterprise long-document use cases. Strong on reasoning across long contexts. The real-time X data access adds unique capability for research tasks that need current information alongside large documents.
Via X Premium ($8/month) or X Premium+ ($16/month). API via xAI at approximately $3/$15 per 1M tokens.
Try freeGPT-5.2's 400K context window handles most enterprise document workloads — full contracts, lengthy reports, large codebases. The hallucination rate of 6.2% and strong capability make it the most reliable choice for document tasks where accuracy is critical and your document fits within 400K tokens.
Free tier at chatgpt.com. API at $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens.
Try freeClaude Sonnet's 200K context is smaller than the others here, but its accuracy and coherence across long documents is notably better than GPT-5.2 in head-to-head tests. It maintains detail recall from early in long prompts more reliably — which matters as much as raw context size for many real tasks.
Free tier at claude.ai. API at $3/$15 per 1M tokens.
Try freeBottom line
For documents over 400K tokens: Gemini 3 Pro (managed, high quality) or Llama 4 Scout (self-hosted, privacy-first). For documents between 128K and 400K: GPT-5.2 or Claude Sonnet depending on whether you prioritize capability or coherence. For anything under 128K, context window is not the deciding factor — pick based on task type.
Quick comparison
| Model | Rating | Price (input) | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 4 Scout | 7.5/10 | $0.11/1M | 10.0M |
| Gemini 3 Pro | 8.8/10 | Free | 1.0M |
| Grok 4.1 | 8.0/10 | $3/1M | 2.0M |
| GPT-5.2 | 8.3/10 | $1.75/1M | 400K |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 8.0/10 | $3/1M | 200K |