[good]

Best LLM for Long Documents in 2026

Context window size is the deciding factor when your document is longer than a model can hold in memory. Below that limit, quality and coherence matter more. Here is how the major models stack up on both dimensions.

Last updated: February 2026

#1
Llama 4 ScoutMeta7.5/10Our Pick

Llama 4 Scout's 10 million token context window is in a category of its own — roughly 7.5 million words. Entire book series, massive codebases, or years of email history fit in a single prompt. Open weights mean you can self-host for maximum privacy. The intelligence gap vs frontier models is real but the context advantage is dramatic.

API via Groq: $0.11/$0.11 per 1M tokens. Free tier available on Groq. Self-host with GPU hardware.

Try free
#2
Gemini 3 ProGoogle8.8/10

Gemini 3 Pro's 1 million token context window is the largest for a fully managed commercial model — roughly 750,000 words. Handles full books, large codebases, and multi-document research sets. AA Intelligence Index 48.44 means it's also more capable than Llama 4 Scout on the actual analysis once it has the document loaded.

Free via gemini.google.com. API at $2/$12 per 1M tokens (2× rate for prompts over 200K tokens).

Try free
#3
Grok 4.1xAI8.0/10

Grok 4.1's 2 million token context window is the second-largest among commercial models and covers most enterprise long-document use cases. Strong on reasoning across long contexts. The real-time X data access adds unique capability for research tasks that need current information alongside large documents.

Via X Premium ($8/month) or X Premium+ ($16/month). API via xAI at approximately $3/$15 per 1M tokens.

Try free
#4
GPT-5.2OpenAI8.3/10

GPT-5.2's 400K context window handles most enterprise document workloads — full contracts, lengthy reports, large codebases. The hallucination rate of 6.2% and strong capability make it the most reliable choice for document tasks where accuracy is critical and your document fits within 400K tokens.

Free tier at chatgpt.com. API at $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens.

Try free
#5
Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic8.0/10

Claude Sonnet's 200K context is smaller than the others here, but its accuracy and coherence across long documents is notably better than GPT-5.2 in head-to-head tests. It maintains detail recall from early in long prompts more reliably — which matters as much as raw context size for many real tasks.

Free tier at claude.ai. API at $3/$15 per 1M tokens.

Try free

Bottom line

For documents over 400K tokens: Gemini 3 Pro (managed, high quality) or Llama 4 Scout (self-hosted, privacy-first). For documents between 128K and 400K: GPT-5.2 or Claude Sonnet depending on whether you prioritize capability or coherence. For anything under 128K, context window is not the deciding factor — pick based on task type.

Quick comparison

ModelRatingPrice (input)Context
Llama 4 Scout7.5/10$0.11/1M10.0M
Gemini 3 Pro8.8/10Free1.0M
Grok 4.18.0/10$3/1M2.0M
GPT-5.28.3/10$1.75/1M400K
Claude Sonnet 4.68.0/10$3/1M200K